ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Flexible Coupling of Synaptic and Intrinsic Plasticity in a Cerebellar Circuit.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is increasingly recognized that learning and memory depend not only on changes in synaptic strength but also on experience-dependent modifications of intrinsic neuronal excitability. However, how these two forms of plasticity interact within a neural circuit to shape behavior remains unclear. Here, we investigated the coordination of the synaptic and intrinsic plasticity in the cerebellar flocculus, which supports oculomotor learning. Using optogenetics and ex vivo electrophysiology, we examined plasticity mechanisms underlying different learned modifications of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in male and female mice. Optogenetic tetanization of granule cells mimicked and occluded VOR-decrease learning, suggesting a role of synaptic and/or intrinsic long-term potentiation (LTP) in this form of learning. Ex vivo recordings further revealed that both VOR-decrease learning and VOR habituation were associated with synaptic LTP at parallel fiber (PF)→Purkinje cell synapses. However, whereas VOR-decrease learning did not alter Purkinje cell intrinsic excitability, VOR habituation induced long-term depression of intrinsic excitability. Paralleling the measured intrinsic plasticity, PF-elicited spiking was unchanged after VOR-decrease learning and decreased after habituation, as it did after VOR-increase learning. The results demonstrate that synaptic and intrinsic plasticity can be flexibly recruited in different combinations to support different modifications of a given behavior by learning. Consequently, learning-related changes in synaptically driven spiking cannot reliably be predicted from the changes in synaptically driven currents alone. Rather, intrinsic excitability can play a dominant role in determining whether there are changes in synaptically driven spiking after learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.