ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026
Current Status and Future Perspective for Bladder Cancer MR Imaging and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Japan: Challenges and Solutions.
Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of MRI in the Clinical Management of Urologic and Nephrological Disorders.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer carries one of the highest lifetime costs among malignancies, and accurate distinction between non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive disease is essential for appropriate treatment selection. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) have emerged as key tools for standardizing local staging of bladder cancer; however, their clinical uptake in Japan remains limited. This non-systematic narrative review summarizes the fundamentals and current evidence of VI-RADS, outlines Japan-specific barriers to its implementation, and proposes practical solutions and future perspectives. It describes patient preparation and VI-RADS-compliant mpMRI protocols, sequence-specific criteria for estimating muscle invasion, and the diagnostic performance and reproducibility reported in recent meta-analyses. It also evaluates VI-RADS within the context of major international and Japanese guidelines, highlighting the current gap between imaging-based risk stratification and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT)-centered decision-making. Particular focus is placed on challenges arising from Japan's healthcare structure, heterogeneous MRI quality, and shortage of subspecialized radiologists, as well as common diagnostic pitfalls related to technical, reader, and tumor factors. Recent diagnostic advances-including deep learning-based image reconstruction, improved diffusion and dynamic contrast techniques, and qualitative or quantitative adjunct biomarkers, such as peritumoral enhancement, tumor contact length, diffusion kurtosis metrics, radiomics, and artificial intelligence-based prediction models-are reviewed as promising avenues to enhance diagnostic confidence and inter-reader agreement. Finally, the review discusses MRI-first and MRI-guided clinical pathways under investigation, in which VI-RADS-based risk stratification informs the selective use of TURBT, and facilitates more timely, tailored, definitive therapy. In the future, sustained educational efforts, protocol standardization, quality monitoring, and outcome-based prospective trials will be crucial for establishing bladder MRI and VI-RADS as integral components of personalized bladder cancer care in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.