ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
A machine learning model for prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: development and validation study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Culture-Confirmed Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for predicting neonatal bacterial infections: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Neonatal Bloodstream Infections: A Narrative Review on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges and Prospects in Developing Countries.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Machine-Learning Models Outperform Clinicians in Predicting Postnatal Growth Failure Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEarly-onset sepsis (EOS), which occurs within the first 72 hours of life, can often be fatal for neonates. Machine learning (ML) models demonstrate promise for timely diagnosis. However, current ML models primarily rely on data from high-income countries, which reduces their applicability to low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) that have a higher burden and different disease profiles. We developed an ML model for the timely prediction of culture-proven EOS in LMICs.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study (2011-2014) carried out in three level-3 neonatal units in India. Data from inborn neonates suspected of having EOS were extracted, and cases of culture-negative sepsis were excluded. By implementing a dynamic 80:20 (train:test) data split, two feature selection methods were employed-Boruta and Lasso-across 64 variables, and five ML techniques were applied. The aim was to achieve 90% sensitivity to identify the optimal model based on performance metrics. The developed model was integrated into a web application and validated in an external cohort of neonates born between 2015 and 2021.
resultsOf 2924 neonates, 548 (18.7%) had culture-proven sepsis. The mean gestation and birth weight were 35.3 (±3.8) weeks and 2112 (±754) g, respectively. The Boruta and random forest classifier yielded the best model, which included 28 perinatal-neonatal variables. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 90.3% and 40.6%, respectively. In external validation (n=147; 26 culture-proven sepsis cases), the model's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 92.3%, 37.2%, 24.0% and 95.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 100% in asymptomatic neonates with only perinatal risk factors for EOS. The use of the model could have reduced antibiotic usage from 74.8% to 55.7% (risk difference: -19.1%; 95% CI -8.3 to -29.7).
conclusionsThe ML model demonstrated high sensitivity and acceptable specificity in predicting EOS. This prediction model has the potential to assist in the timely and reliable identification of culture-positive sepsis and may serve as a bedside decision support tool in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.