Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741021›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2026

Towards improving maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in the African region: an analysis of 25 countries from 2015 until 2022.

Triphonie Nkurunziza, Desire Habonimana, Assumpta Muriithi, Sylvia Deganus, Janet Kayita, Adeniyi Aderoba, Kasonde Mwinga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Triphonie NkurunzizaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo.
Desire HabonimanaCentre de Recherche Universitaire en Santé (CURSA), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Bujumbura Mairie, Burundi desire.habonimana@ub.edu.bi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-5558
Assumpta MuriithiReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo.
Sylvia DeganusTema General Hospital, Tema, Ghana.
Janet KayitaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo.
Adeniyi AderobaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo.
Kasonde MwingaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Africa renewed its efforts to document maternal and perinatal deaths in 2014 following the release of the WHO's maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) guidelines. Successful implementation of MPDSR requires timely notification and a thorough documentation of maternal and perinatal deaths, the development of causal pathways, and the enactment of targeted improvement (change) actions to prevent future avoidable deaths. Similar to the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) iterative process used in the Model for Improvement (MFI), MPDSR rests on robust data reporting systems without which quality improvement initiatives are ineffective. Unfortunately, many African health systems have significant challenges with data collection and reporting, often compounded by a disconnect between public and private sectors, which erode efforts to improve MPDSR. Over the past decades, countries across Africa have produced MPDSR reports that, despite often appearing comprehensive, mask underlying operational deficiencies. These reports consistently highlight substantial barriers to implementing effective death reviews. Findings show that of 47 countries, 25 (53%) provided MPDSR reports, with East and Southern Africa contributing more than half. Notably, under 30% and 12% of maternal and neonatal deaths in the District Health Information Software (DHIS) were notified to MPDSR, and about 63% of maternal deaths were reviewed. Our analysis of MPDSR reports from 25 African countries, covering 2015 to 2022, supplemented by data from DHIS, reveals critical issues: a widespread shortage of skilled maternity healthcare workers trained in MPDSR, inadequate data harmonisation and lack of standardised maternal and newborn health metrics, insufficient funding, the absence of functioning MPDSR committees at facility level and weak leadership committed to maternal and newborn health goals. Addressing these bottlenecks is essential for strengthening MPDSR efforts and should guide WHO and other development partners to scale up maternal and perinatal death surveillance across Africa.

Indexed as

Health policyMaternal healthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID41741021
PMCPMC12959009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.