Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41740994›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

A roadmap to key traits of invasive Drosophilidae.

Gwenaëlle Deconninck, Bréa Raynaud-Berton, Méghan Boulembert, Olivier Chabrerie, Aude Couty, Franck Dedeine, Patrice Eslin, Vincent Foray, Romain Georges, Patricia Gibert and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gwenaëlle Deconninck *Department of Biology, Lund University, Ekologihuset, Kontaktvägen 10, Lund, 223 62, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-0992
Bréa Raynaud-Berton *Institute for Zoology, Halle-Wittenberg University, Hoher Weg 8, Halle (Saale), 06108, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-3848-8164
Méghan BoulembertEDYSAN, Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés, UMR 7058 CNRS, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue St Leu, Amiens Cedex, 80039, France.
Olivier ChabrerieEDYSAN, Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés, UMR 7058 CNRS, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue St Leu, Amiens Cedex, 80039, France.
Aude CoutyEDYSAN, Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés, UMR 7058 CNRS, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue St Leu, Amiens Cedex, 80039, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6734-0400
Franck DedeineInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, IRBI UMR 7261, CNRS - Université de Tours, Avenue Monge, Tours, 37200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0646-4725
Patrice EslinEDYSAN, Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés, UMR 7058 CNRS, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue St Leu, Amiens Cedex, 80039, France.
Vincent ForayInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, IRBI UMR 7261, CNRS - Université de Tours, Avenue Monge, Tours, 37200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-1934
Romain GeorgesUniversité de Rennes, CNRS, EcoBio (Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution) - UMR 6553, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, Rennes Cedex, 35042, France.
Patricia GibertUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, VetAgro Sup, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France.
Laurence MoutonUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, VetAgro Sup, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France.
Sylvain PincebourdeInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, IRBI UMR 7261, CNRS - Université de Tours, Avenue Monge, Tours, 37200, France.
David RenaultUniversité de Rennes, CNRS, EcoBio (Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution) - UMR 6553, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, Rennes Cedex, 35042, France.
Christelle SuppoInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, IRBI UMR 7261, CNRS - Université de Tours, Avenue Monge, Tours, 37200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2277-2859
Hervé ColinetUniversité de Rennes, CNRS, EcoBio (Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution) - UMR 6553, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, Rennes Cedex, 35042, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-CE02-0011France AgriMer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions have intensified in recent decades, mostly driven by international trade and travel, raising significant concerns, particularly regarding insect pests. Once non-native species establish, they can disrupt natural ecosystem stability, undermine agroecosystem sustainability and cause substantial economic losses. The urgency to anticipate these socio-economic impacts has accelerated research into the traits and processes that predispose certain species to invasion success. Our review examines the factors contributing to invasion success, using the well-documented case of Drosophilidae as a model taxon given the extensive literature on this family. The invasion of Drosophila suzukii is the most well studied, yet it represents just one example among several Drosophilidae successful invasions, including those from the genera Drosophila, Scaptomyza and Zaprionus. Their traits and adaptive capacities have enabled them to overcome environmental barriers, facilitating their global spread and establishment. We first explore the selective forces acting on pioneer individuals and their ability to establish reproducing populations. We then analyse the roles of abiotic factors (through phenotypic plasticity, tolerance to thermal and water stress, synergies between multiple stressors) and biotic factors (through the exploitation of novel trophic niches, resistance to competition and predation, symbiont-mediated assistance) in shaping invasion success. A nuanced understanding of how these constraints interact is essential for predicting and managing the proliferation of invasive Drosophilidae and other non-native species. We propose that successful invasive species do not necessarily excel in one single trait but rather perform adequately across multiple traits and processes. In this review, we found support in the literature for 14 key traits and processes of Drosophilidae biology that facilitate a species' ability to become invasive and provide future perspectives to address critical knowledge gaps, paving the way towards a comprehensive understanding of invasion success.

Indexed as

DrosophilidaeIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsEcosystemclimate changeinsectsinvasion ecologylife‐history traitsphenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41740994
PMCPMC13326804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.