Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41740982›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Neural Correlates of Dynamic Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Unexpected Silence and Sound.

Fabian Aurich, Andreas Widmann, Tjerk T Dercksen, Betina Korka, Anni Richter, Max-Philipp Stenner, Nicole Wetzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabian AurichLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-6610-2821
Andreas WidmannWilhelm-Wundt-Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-8581
Tjerk T DercksenLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Betina KorkaZander Labs, Munich, Germany.
Anni RichterLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Max-Philipp StennerLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Nicole WetzelLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences ZS/2016/04/78120Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 425899996Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFGDE4080/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB-1436Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TPC03Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WE5026/4-1Volkswagen Foundation 92977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To interact efficiently with our environment, our brain predicts the sensory effects of our actions and compares them with the actual outcomes. This allows us to adapt our actions when predictions and sensory outcomes mismatch. While this process is generally well understood for action-sound predictions, it is an open question whether these predictions can flexibly switch in frequently changing environments, as they occur in real life. To investigate the flexibility of top-down predictions, we asked participants (N = 41) to press one of two buttons, a left-hand and a right-hand button, and switch hands autonomously. One button frequently produced a sound (80%) and rarely no sound. The other button frequently generated no sound (80%) and rarely produced a sound. In a third, separate condition, each button produced a sound in 50% of the trials. Unexpected sounds and unexpected sound omissions elicited a series of error-related brain responses in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at different levels of auditory processing, including a mismatch negativity (MMN) and the P3 complex for unexpected sounds, and the oN1, oN2, and oP3 complex for unexpected omissions. Moreover, unexpected sounds elicited an equivalent MMN, regardless of whether silence was expected (80%) or no reliable expectation was possible (50%), while later P3 components showed different amplitudes. Our results demonstrate flexible action-sound predictions at sensory and higher cortical levels. Furthermore, they indicate that predicted silence does not have an explicit sensory representation at lower levels but emerges at later stages, when higher-level information has been integrated.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAuditory PerceptionBrainPsychomotor PerformanceAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultactionattentiondeviance detectionmismatch negativity MMNomissionprediction error

Identifiers

PMID41740982
PMCPMC12935523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.