Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41740864›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2026

The Best Screening Test Is the One That Gets Followed-Up On.

Danica M N van den Berg, Chiara C Brück, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Fernando Alarid-Escudero, Anne I Hahn, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Colorectal Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danica M N van den BergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Chiara C BrückDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Pedro Nascimento de LimaRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Fernando Alarid-EscuderoDepartment of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Stanford Health Policy, Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Anne I HahnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Colorectal Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Effective Policies for Colorectal Cancer ControlU01CA253913 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI RUTTER, CAROLYN M, ZAUBER, ANN GRAHAM · 2020 to 2025
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID41740864
PMCPMC13435187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.