Trial reportOrthopaedic surgery2026
Design and Validation of a Novel Orthopedic Device for Enhanced Fracture Stabilization and Reduction Efficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Implications for Surgical Outcomes.
Trial report in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTraumatic long bone fractures require precise reduction and stable fixation to achieve optimal outcomes during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Conventional bone-holding instruments are often associated with prolonged operative time, increased blood loss, reliance on surgical assistance, and higher complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a newly designed orthopedic repositioning device in reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and complications compared with conventional ORIF techniques.
methodsThis randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between 2023 and 2024. Adult patients aged 18-65 years with diaphyseal fractures of the femur, humerus, or tibia who underwent ORIF were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups: an intervention group using the novel repositioning device and a control group undergoing conventional ORIF. All surgeries were performed by a single orthopedic surgeon. The device consists of dual bone holders with a lengthening/shortening mechanism that allows controlled traction, angular correction, and plate insertion without device removal. Primary outcome measures included duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), transfusion requirement, and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 58 patients were included in the final analysis (29 per group), with a mean age of 29.9 years and a predominance of male patients (77.6%). Use of the repositioning device was associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05), shorter surgical duration (p < 0.05), and lower postoperative pain scores (p < 0.05) compared with the control group. The need for blood transfusion was significantly lower in the intervention group (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 28.6% of patients in the control group but were not observed in the device group (p = 0.002). No significant difference in hospital length of stay was detected between groups (p = 0.284). Patients were followed for up to 3 months postoperatively.
conclusionThe novel orthopedic repositioning device improves surgical efficiency and safety in ORIF of long bone fractures by reducing operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and complication rates, supporting its clinical value as an effective adjunct for fracture reduction and stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.