ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Automated Identification of Accessory Mental Foramen Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence in dental imaging: a systematic review of interpretability and the current state of trust evidence.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Investigation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Loop Detection: A Panoramic Radiography Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsTo develop and evaluate a deep learning-based system for automatic detection of the accessory mental foramen (AMF) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to compare the detection accuracy and clinical reliability performance of two convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures for this model.
methodsA total of 3000 CBCT scans were retrospectively screened. After expert evaluation, 700 CBCT scans exhibiting AMFs were identified. For comparative analysis, 700 CBCT scans with normal mental-foramen anatomy were selected as the matched control group. A custom lightweight CNN and a ResNet-50 model were trained for binary classification of AMF presence. Model performance was evaluated by determining accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1-score. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) visualisation was employed to assess the anatomical relevance of the models' attention maps. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two networks.
resultsThe ResNet-50 model achieved superior performance (overall accuracy: 85.8% for ResNet-50 vs 71.1% for the custom CNN). With the ResNet-50 model, anomaly recall improved from 0.68 to 0.88, reducing missed detections by 63%. Grad-CAM analysis demonstrated that the models focused primarily on anatomically valid regions around the MF, confirming the interpretability and clinical relevance of the models.
conclusionsAutomatic detection of the AMF using CBCT and deep learning represents a reliable, objective, and efficient diagnostic approach that minimises observer bias and enhances clinical decision-making. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Deep learning-based detection of AMFs on CBCT can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce the risk of surgical complications by providing consistent, observer-independent evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.