Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41740150›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Stratified Causal Inference for Intensive Care Unit Risk Prediction: Informatics-Based Modeling of Anesthetic Drug Combinations.

Junqi Cui, Weijia Li, Enoch Chi Ngai Lim, Xiaoqin Wu, Chi Eung Danforn Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junqi CuiSchool of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6895-5036
Weijia LiDongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6322-8366
Enoch Chi Ngai LimTranslational Research Department, Specialist Medical Services Group, Earlwood, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6349-4531
Xiaoqin WuSydney Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Haymarket, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-274X
Chi Eung Danforn LimTranslational Research Department, Specialist Medical Services Group, Earlwood, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-8154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission affects 15% to 20% of surgical patients and represents a major source of morbidity and health care costs. Current anesthetic dosing relies on empirical guidelines rather than individualized risk assessment. We developed a counterfactual dose-response model to identify optimal fentanyl-propofol combinations. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a stratified, causal machine learning framework using electronic health record data to identify optimal fentanyl-propofol dose combinations and predict postoperative ICU admission risk, enabling precision anesthesia and individualized clinical decision support. Methods: We analyzed perioperative electronic health records of 67,134 surgical procedures from UC Irvine Medical Center (2017-2022). A hierarchical learning framework was used to estimate causal effects while controlling for confounding variables. A total of 6 dose-sensitive subgroups were identified through stratified analysis. The primary end point was postoperative ICU admission. Results: High-risk combinations (fentanyl >5 mcg/kg with propofol <1 mg/kg) increased ICU admissions' absolute risk difference by 36% (absolute risk increase; 95% CI 0.351-0.509; P<.001). A total of 6 patient subgroups demonstrated distinct dose-response patterns, with populations considered vulnerable (high glucose, elevated creatinine) showing elevated risk even at standard doses. The optimal dose range for decision-making was determined to be 1.25 to 4.25 mg/kg for propofol and 3.5 to 4.0 mcg/kg for fentanyl. Conclusions: Fentanyl-propofol combinations exhibit complex, nonlinear dose-response relationships with ICU admission risk. High-dose combinations markedly increase risk through synergistic effects, while specific patient subgroups require enhanced monitoring even at standard doses. These findings support the development of individualized dosing algorithms and risk assessment tools that could inform future decision support tools aimed at reducing postoperative ICU use, although their predictive performance and clinical impact would require external validation.

Indexed as

counterfactual modelingdose-response analysisfentanylintensive carepropofol

Identifiers

PMID41740150
PMCPMC12935416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.