ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Temporal Annotation of German Clinical Language in Real and Synthetic Clinical Documents: Corpus Development and Baseline Tagger Validation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporal information about patients constitutes a precious source for clinical decision-making and medical treatment. The automatic extraction of such data from unstructured clinical narratives requires time-annotated clinical reports and notes from which time-informed taggers can be learned. Unfortunately, the non-English clinical language community, the German one as a typical example, with only a few exceptions, generally lacks such time-annotated resources to train and evaluate temporal taggers.
objectiveTo overcome this metadata bottleneck, we developed a TimeML-conformant annotation schema for both temporal entities and temporal relations adapted to the needs of German medical language. Based on the annotations derived therefrom, we trained state-of-the-art baseline taggers to recognize temporal expressions in clinical documents.
methodsStarting from temporal annotation guidelines for English clinical documents, we developed preliminary annotation guidelines for temporal named entities and temporal relations for the German language. These guidelines were subsequently refined and adapted to German clinical jargon, incorporating the work experience of 5 clinically trained annotators (students of medicine). For this task, we used randomly selected smaller subsets of 2 German clinical corpora-a real-world one (3000PA
resultsWe created 3000PA
conclusionsWe here introduce the first TimeML-compliant annotation scheme for time expressions occurring in German clinical language and apply it to 2 clinical corpora, one with nondistributable real clinical data, the other with distributable synthetic ones. The latter constitutes the first publicly accessible, temporally annotated clinical corpus for the German language. The time tagger trained on these datasets is the first of its kind, fully compliant with the TimeML markup language. The amounts of temporal metadata in our corpora are among the largest datasets ever produced for the clinical domain, both compared with English and German predecessors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.