ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
A Rational Optimization Approach for the Development of a Multiplexed Lateral Flow Immunoassay: Detection of Nonepithelial Ovarian Cancer Markers in Human Serum.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rise of non-communicable diseases, lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) are well-positioned to address the demand for disease monitoring. We present the use of peroxidase-mimicking platinum nanozyme conjugates targeting three ovarian germ cell tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125)) in LFIA. A "design of experiments" (DoE) approach was used to optimize antibody-nanozyme conjugation, superseding conventional "one-factor-at-a-time" optimization strategies, which neglect factor-to-factor interactions obscuring identification of optimal conditions. Crucial to disease monitoring, assays must demonstrate limits of detection (LoD) within clinically defined ranges and produce quantitative readouts. We address limitations of typical LoD calculations, which assume homoscedastic variance across marker concentrations, presenting an alternative model and applying it to assess LFIA performance, subsequently demonstrating clinically relevant LoDs in human serum. To robustly derive marker concentrations from LFIA readouts, the model was coupled with the resolution molecular concentration and, using patient samples, validated against laboratory gold standard values. AFP and HCG assays align well with gold standard measurements, with sensitivities of 87.5% and 100%, and specificities of 98.3% and 100%, respectively. This work outlines a development pipeline of a patient sample validated semiquantitative LFIA, utilizing DoE for streamlined optimization and improving modeling approaches to quantify performance in a manner representative of assay function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.