ArticleESC heart failure2026
Costs and outcomes in Finnish heart failure patients treated with left ventricular assist device or heart transplant.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis real-world, retrospective study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in advanced heart failure (HF) patients treated at Helsinki University Hospital with heart transplantation (HTx) or elective or urgent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy over 3 years. METHODS AND
resultsData were extracted from electronic medical records and validated through clinician review. Patients (n = 78) were categorized into three groups: Group 1, HTx as first procedure, stratified into those without (1a, n = 25) and with (1b, n = 11) prior LVAD; Group 2, elective LVAD (n = 30); and Group 3, urgent LVAD (n = 12). Study endpoints included survival, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) results, and healthcare costs at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Outcomes and costs were indirectly compared to explore their implications for future patient selection strategies.Survival exceeded 80% in groups 1 and 2. Group 1a had a 24-month survival rate of 84.0% (95% CI: 0.628-0.937), with most deaths (3 of 4) occurring within the first 3 months. Group 1b showed 100% survival throughout follow-up, and group 2 stabilized at 93.4% (95% CI: 0.759-0.983) after two early deaths. Group 3 had a progressive decline to 62.5% at 24 months (95% CI: 0.268-0.846). The confidence intervals between these groups overlap due to the small sample size in group 3. Observed 6-minute walking test (6MWT) performance improved steadily over the first year in all groups, with increases in distance walked and percentage of predicted values observed increasing between baseline and 12 months.Most healthcare expenses were concentrated within the first 3 months post-surgery. At 3 months, median costs per patient were €177 380 [IQR €121 900] (1a), €207 826 [IQR €83 398] (1b), €187 558 [IQR €67 664] (2), and €293 355 [IQR €67 664] (3). Group 3 incurred significantly higher costs compared to groups 1a (P = .004) and 2 (P = .003). While no significant difference was observed between group 3 and group 1b (P = .335), a difference was observed when group 1a and b were pooled. These trends were consistent at 6 months. The differences were no longer statistically significant at 12 and 24 months, which may be due to wider cost variation or diminishing sample size.
conclusionElective LVAD in patients with advanced HF offers survival outcomes comparable to HTx and incurs similar costs and is preferable to urgent LVAD, which is associated with higher costs and may lead to poorer outcomes. These findings support more proactive patient selection and care pathway optimization in advanced HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.