ArticlePloS one2026
Episiotomy practices and associated factors in central Vietnam.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResearch on episiotomy practices in Vietnam is limited. This study aimed to describe episiotomy use and identify factors associated with its practice among vaginal births in Central Vietnam, following the implementation of restrictive episiotomy guidelines.
methodsWe used data from a hospital-based, retrospective study conducted at Danang Hospital for Women and Children from April 2015 to March 2016. The study included all singleton, full-term vaginal births. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of episiotomy based on selected neonatal or maternal factors.
resultsAmong 3,471 eligible singleton births, 2,770 mothers (79.8%, 95% CI: 78.4% - 81.1%) underwent an episiotomy. The episiotomy rate was significantly higher in first-time births (97.7%, 95% CI: 96.8% - 98.3%) compared to second or subsequent births (61.5%, 95% CI: 59.2% - 63.8%), p < 0.001. Multivariable analyses showed that first-time births, higher birth weight, younger maternal age, a less physical active occupation, and a history of miscarriage were significantly associated with higher odds of episiotomy. For example, the odds of episiotomy in first-time births was 24.21 (95% confidence interval (CI): 17.13 - 34.22) times higher than in second or subsequent births, and the odds for mothers with a history of miscarriage was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.03 - 1.73) compared to those without. Stratified analysis showed that these associations persisted in multiparous women but were not observed in primiparous women.
conclusionThis study highlights a very high episiotomy rate in Central Vietnam, especially among primiparous women despite recommendations from the World Health Organization and the Vietnam Ministry of Health. Several modifiable maternal and neonatal factors are linked to episiotomy use in multiparous women. While one year may not be sufficient to fully assess the restrictive policy's effect, the results of our study also suggest that the policy has not had a significant impact on reducing the episiotomy rate after one year. This indicates that, in addition to the policy, further support and interventions are needed to reduce episiotomy rate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.