Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739842›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

AI-ECG classification for Brugada syndrome: A study of machine learning techniques to optimise for limited datasets.

Keenan Saleh, Raaif Hadadi, Yixiu Liang, Hong Wong, Arunashis Sau, James Howard, Evan Brittain, Jeffrey Annis, Majd El-Harasis, Matthew Shun-Shin and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Keenan SalehNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-9276
Raaif HadadiDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Yixiu LiangNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Hong WongNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Arunashis SauNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
James HowardNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Evan BrittainVanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, United States of America.
Jeffrey AnnisVanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, United States of America.
Majd El-HarasisVanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, United States of America.
Matthew Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Jagdeep MohalNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Akriti NaraenNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Jack SamwaysNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-9610
Jessica ArticoImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
James WareNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Prapa KanagaratnamNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Massoud ZolgharniNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-2904
Wenjia BaiDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Amanda VarnavaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Zachary WhinnettNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Ahran ArnoldNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-0170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks can classify ECGs with high accuracy when training data is abundant. Rare conditions like Brugada syndrome, an inherited arrhythmia syndrome predisposing to sudden death, pose challenges due to data scarcity hindering model training. We evaluated multiple machine learning (ML) approaches to optimise a Brugada ECG classification model using limited training data. The baseline model was trained on a dataset comprising 176 Brugada, 176 right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 352 normal ECGs from Zhongshan Hospital (Zhongshan-baseline dataset), framed as a binary classification task to distinguish Brugada from non-Brugada ECGs. A 25%-75% train-test split was used to exacerbate data scarcity. To enhance training, we incorporated three additional datasets: (i) a different, labelled ECG dataset from Zhongshan Hospital including normal and RBBB ECGs (Zhongshan-pretrain), (ii) an unlabelled ECG dataset from Hammersmith Hospital including Brugada and non-Brugada ECGs (Imperial), (iii) an open-access labelled ECG dataset (PTB-XL). Three strategies were tested: (1) supervised pretraining, (2) self-supervised pretraining with data augmentation, and (3) oversampling using SMOTE (synthetic minority oversampling technique). Each model was evaluated on the unseen internal test set and an external Brugada mimic dataset. The models were re-trained using an 80%-20% train-test split as a secondary analysis. The baseline model achieved 92.2% accuracy, F1-score 0.837, and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) 0.962. Supervised pretraining significantly improved performance when training data was scarce, with the best model pretrained on the Zhongshan-pretrain dataset boosting accuracy (+3.2%), F1-score (+0.071) and AUC + 0.019), with consistent cross-validation performance. Self-supervised pretraining produced smaller and more variable gains, although select models better mitigated against false positives on the Brugada mimic dataset. SMOTE oversampling showed inconsistent effects on performance. Incorporating pretraining and oversampling may facilitate the development of more accurate AI-ECG models for rare diseases when training data is limited but provides diminishing returns when adequate labelled data is available.

Identifiers

PMID41739842
PMCPMC12935214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.