Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739841›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An exploration of perceptions of flourishing and social determinants of health among medical, physician assistant, and nurse practitioner students: A mixed methods study.

Stephanie Neary, Benjamin Doolittle, Martina Mueller, Michelle Nichols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie NearyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Physician Assistant Online Program, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-4578
Benjamin DoolittleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Martina MuellerCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-5142
Michelle NicholsDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-9649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe individual perceptions of flourishing among medical (MD), physician assistant (PA), and nurse practitioner (NP) students and the relationship between these perceptions and social determinants of health (SDOH). MD, PA, and NP students from two universities were recruited to participate in this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. The quantitative phase took place between August and October 2023, and findings were used to purposively recruit participants for interviews that were conducted in January and February 2024. The survey included the WellRx and the Secure Flourish Index (SFI); participants applied a percentage weight (0-100%) to each of the six SFI domains of flourishing based on their perceived relative importance to their individual flourishing. Survey participants were stratified into three SDOH risk levels based on WellRx score; descriptive statistics and ANOVA testing were performed (alpha = 0.05). Interviews explored definitions of flourishing, perceptions of flourishing domains, and how SDOH needs relate to flourishing. A total of 280 of 1820 eligible students (15.4%) completed the survey, and 34 students across all three established SDOH risk groups were interviewed. Results demonstrated a significant relationship between SDOH factors and flourishing perceptions. Low-risk group students had an average SFI score that was over 15.0 points greater than those in the high-risk group (M88.0(SD ± 14.4) versus M72.7(SD ± 13.5); p < .001). Perceived relative domain importance to flourishing significantly varied by SDOH risk level for multiple domains. Participant definitions of flourishing included elements of personal growth and a balance of happiness and success; interviews revealed that students in all SDOH risk levels are experiencing financial strain that negatively impacts flourishing across SFI domains. Perceptions of flourishing and the relative importance of established flourishing domains are highly influenced by social determinants of health and living experiences. Educators should consider individual perspectives and values when measuring flourishing and planning wellness interventions.

Identifiers

PMID41739841
PMCPMC12935265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.