ArticlePloS one2026
Feeding practices of under-two children in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, child feeding practices remain suboptimal and contribute substantially to a high burden of malnutrition. In Ethiopia, evidence on the overall status of feeding practices among children under two years of age is limited. This study therefore sought to estimate the pooled prevalence of timely initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, timely initiation of complementary feeding, and minimum acceptable diet, as well as to identify the factors associated with these practices.
methodThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in Scopus, HINARI, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed/MEDLINE. Cross-sectional and case-control studies published in English were included. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using Cochran Q test and the I2 statistic. Data analysis was done using STATA/MP version 17.0. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to identify factors. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, Egger weighted regression, and Begg rank correlation tests.
resultsA total of 107 articles were included in this study. The pooled prevalence of timely initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, timely initiation of complementary feeding, and optimal feeding practice were 64% (95% CI: 50%, 78%), 58.6% (95% CI: 52.6%, 64.5%), 60.51% (95% CI: 54.2%, 66.9%), and 20.4% (95% CI: 13.6%, 27.0%), respectively. Antenatal care (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.5, 7.5), place of delivery (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.9), and normal delivery (AOR = 3.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 10) were positively associated with timely initiation of breastfeeding. Exclusive breastfeeding was positively associated with infant age 0-1 (AOR = 4.4; 95% CI: 1.4, 13.6) and 2-3 months (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2, 5.1), maternal age > 35 (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.3, 8.7), residence (AOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 3.1), maternal occupation (AOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.7), place of delivery (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI:1.2, 3.7), normal delivery (AOR = 1.7; 95 CI:1.2, 2.6), postnatal care (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.3), counseling (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI:1.4, 3.9) and husband support (AOR = 2.9; 95% CI:1.9, 4.4) were positively associated with EBF. Antenatal care (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI:1.5, 7.5) and place of delivery (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI:1.1, 4.9) were positively associated with timely initiation of complementary feeding. Optimal infant feeding practice was positively associated with nutrition education through demonstrations (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI:1.3, 3.3) and age of child 18-23 months (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI:1.2, 6.1).
conclusionThis study demonstrated that infant feeding practices were below both national and international recommendations, exposing children at higher risk of malnutrition, morbidity, and mortality. These suboptimal feeding practices also hinder progress toward achieving to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Several factors were identified as significant determinants of feeding practices, including antenatal care attendance, place and mode of delivery, postnatal care utilization, maternal occupation, maternal age, child's age, breastfeeding counseling, husband's support, place of residence, and participation in complementary food preparation demonstrations. Improving infant feeding practices therefore requires a comprehensive approach. Key strategies to improve infant feeding practices should include nutrition education through practical demonstrations, promoting full attendance of antenatal and postnatal care, increasing institutional deliveries, enhancing husband involvement, and tailoring interventions to the child's age as well as the mother's age and place of residence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.