ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of a collaborative care system in primary care in the implementation of ambulatory follow-up in mental health: A study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06581874 (Evaluation of a Collaborative Mental Health Care System), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of a Collaborative Mental Health Care System
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to secondary psychiatric consultation is often challenging for general practitioners (GPs), potentially resulting in treatment delays or increased reliance on emergency services. The med@psy system is a collaborative care platform that enables GPs to schedule consultation appointments with psychiatrists within 48 hours. This study aims to compare the implementation of outpatient follow-up between two care pathways: attendance at a psychiatric emergency department for a consultation followed by discharge home and psychiatric consultation referred by the patient's GP via the med@psy collaborative care system. The study consists of two prospective, multicenter, comparative and nonrandomized cohorts. Patients will be teleconsulted at one month and again at three months to assess whether they have received appropriate outpatient follow-up. This is a real-life study involving GPs and psychiatrists within a collaborative care model. The strengths and limitations of this study are discussed below. The results of this study will help gather valuable data on these two care pathways and will serve as a basis for improving and optimizing patient management strategies in outpatient mental health care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06581874.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.