SynthesisPloS one2026
Masculinities and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen are more likely to report suicidal ideation and make suicide attempts, while men are more likely to die by suicide. There has been much discussion of the possible contribution of masculinity (i.e., attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours understood to be 'masculine' through construction of gendered identities in local contexts) to this gender paradox of suicide. Here we report the first systematic literature review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression testing relationships between measures of masculinity and suicidality.
methodsWe searched for articles using the following search terms in Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, and APA PsychINFO in July 2024 (("gender role*" OR "gender-role*" OR "sex role*" OR "sex-role*" OR "masculin*" (TOPIC)) AND ("suicid*" (TOPIC))). We excluded papers which examined non-suicidal self-injury, were not based on individual-level valid and reliable quantitative measures of masculinity and suicidality, and which did not provide sufficient statistical information to compute effect size.
resultsAcross 23 studies the relationship between the multiple and diverse measures of masculinity and of suicidality overall was non-significant (r = 0·03 [95% CI: -0·01, 0·1], z = 1.75, p = 0.341) and showed significant heterogeneity. Given the range of operationalisations of masculinity included, and the high heterogeneity, we urge caution in interpreting the pooled overall relationship. Meta-regression showed moderation of the overall relationship by both measure of masculinity and suicidality. That is, the positive relationship between masculinity and suicidality was stronger for measures of masculinity that focussed on emotional restriction and pursuit of status, and for suicidal action than ideation. Conversely, there were inverse relationships between strength-based measures of masculinity and suicidality. LIMITATIONS: Our results demonstrated significant heterogeneity, and measures of masculinity are likely to be largely outdated.
conclusionsOur results suggest there is value in further work identifying specific aspects of contemporary psychological masculinity which link to suicidality, which is of relevance to clinical assessment and management of suicidality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.