ArticlePloS one2026
Democracy, transparency, economic development, religion, and women on boards of national Olympic committees: Evidence from 89 countries.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors investigate the connection between a country's level of democracy, transparency, economic development, religion, and the representation of women on the national Olympic committees' (NOC) boards. Using data from 89 countries, they analysed how democracy, governance quality, gross national income per capita, and religious composition are associated with women's representation on NOC boards. Results reveal that countries with higher levels of democracy, greater transparency scores, higher economic development, a large proportion of Protestants, and a higher proportion of Jewish adherents were related to a greater proportion of women on NOC boards. The findings highlight the importance of democratic institutions, governance quality, and economic prosperity in creating conditions that support women's advancement into decision-making roles, while religious context further influences cultural and normative factors that influence gender equality. Further research should explore the interplay among types of democracy, religious indices, and geographical characteristics to better understand the mechanism driving gender-balanced leadership. Overall, promoting democratic principles, participatory and inclusive governance, transparency, economic opportunity, and religious freedom can facilitate inclusive societal norms and enhance gender diversity, equity, and inclusion leadership roles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.