Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739722›Full record

ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2026

Cost-effectiveness of expanding access to intrauterine device provision by nurses in the public health system: an economic decision analysis using a Markov model, Pernambuco, 2023.

Juliana da Silva Nogueira, Camilla Maria Ferreira de Aquino, Juliana Gonçalves de Araújo, Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha, Umbelina Cravo Teixeira Lagioia, Agostinho de Sousa Machado Junior, Adriana Falangola Benjamin Bezerra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliana da Silva NogueiraUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Ambulatório de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2052-2784
Camilla Maria Ferreira de AquinoInstituto Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-132X
Juliana Gonçalves de AraújoUniversidade de Pernambuco, Coordenação do MBA em Gestão Empresarial, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2677-4357
Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira FilhaUniversity of York, York, NYorks, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-9998
Umbelina Cravo Teixeira LagioiaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Ciências Contábeis, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-7808
Agostinho de Sousa Machado JuniorUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Ginecologia, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-9937
Adriana Falangola Benjamin BezerraUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Saúde Pública, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5278-3727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the cost-effectiveness of increasing the provision and insertion of intrauterine devices following the training of nurses.

methodsAn economic decision analysis using a Markov model was conducted in TreeAge Pro Healthcare 2023 to compare four scenarios in Pernambuco, based on the 2023 population estimate. The current scenario (reference) has a 0.24% provision rate of intrauterine devices. The other scenarios projected increases to 2% (Scenario 1), 3.2% (Scenario 2), and 4% (Scenario 3). Costs related to training and to the distribution of intrauterine devices were analyzed using the absorption costing method. Utilities were estimated based on the literature, adopting the Brazilian willingness-to-pay threshold of up to BRL 40,000.00, allowing flexibility up to BRL 120,000.00 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

resultsScenario 1 (2% provision) showed the best cost-effectiveness ratio compared to the current scenario, with an incremental cost of BRL 73,720.20 per QALY gained and benefits observed three months after training. The other scenarios were dominated, meaning that they presented higher costs and lower effectiveness, making them disadvantageous in the short term.

conclusionExpanding the provision to 2% through nurse training is a cost-effective strategy compared to the current level. In addition to optimizing public resources, this measure may reduce the unmet demand for contraception.

Identifiers

PMID41739722
PMCPMC12928549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.