ArticleThe oncologist2026
"Our Community is not Appropriately Served": LGBTQ+ Cancer Survivors and Caregivers have Suggestions for Providers.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, other sexual or gender minority) people experience unique challenges in cancer care. This study describes LGBTQ+ survivors' and caregivers' experiences interacting with cancer care providers and their recommendations for delivering care with cultural humility.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative focus group data to extract community members' suggestions for providers. We conducted 10 focus groups with 52 LGBTQ+ cancer survivors and caregivers. Participants were recruited as survivor/caregiver dyads in which at least one member (the survivor and/or the caregiver) identified as LGBTQ+. Focus groups were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. A community advisory board participated in one focus group and was consulted on study design, findings, and dissemination.
resultsParticipants identified several recommendations for healthcare providers to improve cancer care delivery for LGBTQ+ survivors and their caregivers. This included, understanding that many LGBTQ+ patients experience minority stress during their cancer care; creating a welcoming space for LGBTQ+ people in care settings with visual indications of inclusivity; using affirming or unassuming language; not shying away from sexual health discussions; offering additional resources, ideally LGBTQ+-specific resources, to LGBTQ+ survivors and caregivers; and incorporating patient-centered approaches.
conclusionActing on LGBTQ+ cancer survivors' and caregivers' perspectives and recommendations for providers can help improve cancer care delivery for the LGBTQ+ community. This feedback can be utilized to inform medical trainings and innovative support programs to improve provider-patient communication and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.