Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739654›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Improving Conformational Ensembles of Folded Proteins in Go̅Martini.

Maksim Kalutskii, Carter J Wilson, Helmut Grubmüller, Maxim Igaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maksim KalutskiiTheoretical and Computational Biophysics Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-5492-6083
Carter J WilsonComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Helmut GrubmüllerTheoretical and Computational Biophysics Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-3144
Maxim IgaevTheoretical and Computational Biophysics Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-1604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Martini coarse-grained (CG) force field enables efficient simulations of biomolecular systems but cannot reliably maintain folded protein structures. To stabilize proteins during simulation, Martini is typically combined with structure-based force fields such as elastic network models (ENMs) or Go̅ models. While these approaches preserve global folds and capture protein flexibility, their ability to reproduce conformational dynamics remains unclear. Here, we evaluate Martini 3 combined with ENMs or Go̅ models on three folded proteins and show that both approaches struggle to sample the conformational space observed in atomistic simulations, even when uniform interaction strengths or equilibrium bond distances are adjusted. This limitation arises from the assumption of a uniform interaction network, in which all Go̅-bonds are assigned the same ϵ value, and therefore have the same potential depth. To overcome this, we present a fully automated, perturbation-based optimization approach for Go̅ networks, PoGo̅, that iteratively refines a nonuniform Go̅ network against a precomputed atomistic free-energy landscape in essential conformational space. Moreover, we demonstrate that our approach can also be used to optimize ENMs. In both cases, convergence is rapid and yields CG ensembles in close agreement with reference atomistic simulations. As a cross-validation, the optimization also improves the root-mean-square fluctuation profile.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsProtein ConformationProtein FoldingThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID41739654
PMCPMC12980703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.