ArticleeLife2026
Flexible neural representations of abstract structural knowledge in the human entorhinal cortex.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The compositionality continuum as a principle for studying the neural basis of intelligence.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- An abstract relational map emerges in the human medial prefrontal cortex with consolidation.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Memory reactivation during sleep promotes structure abstraction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Action information is integrated into entorhinal representations of conceptual space and is reflected in eye movements.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Flexible neural representations of abstract structural knowledge in the human entorhinal cortex.eLife · 2026Article
- Entorhinal Cortex Signals Dimensions of Past Experience That Can Be Generalized in a Novel Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Distinct contributions of hippocampal pathways in learning regularities and exceptions revealed by functional footprints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans' ability for generalization is outstanding. It is flexible enough to identify cases where knowledge from prior tasks is relevant, even when many features of the current task are different, such as the sensory stimuli or the size of the task state space. We have previously shown that in abstract tasks, humans can generalize knowledge in cases where the only cross-task shared feature is the statistical rules that govern the task's state-state relationships. Here, we hypothesized that this capacity is associated with generalizable representations in the entorhinal cortex (EC). This hypothesis was based on the EC's generalizable representations in spatial tasks and recent discoveries about its role in the representation of abstract tasks. We first develop an analysis method capable of testing for such representations in fMRI data, explain why other common methods would have failed for our task, and validate our method through a combination of electrophysiological data analysis, simulations, and fMRI sanity checks. We then show with fMRI that EC representations generalize across complex non-spatial tasks that share a hexagonal grid structural form but differ in their size and sensory stimuli, that is their only shared feature is the rules governing their statistical structure. There was no clear evidence for such generalization in EC for non-spatial tasks with clustered, as opposed to planar, structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.