Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739473›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Test Ordering and Completion During Virtual vs In-Person Annual Visits.

Ishani Ganguli, Nicholas E Daley, Ateev Mehrotra, Meredith B Rosenthal, David M Cutler

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ishani GanguliHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nicholas E DaleyDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Meredith B RosenthalHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
David M CutlerHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Telemedicine use has been associated with lower rates of overall testing and low-value testing, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Objective: To compare medical screening test ordering and completion rates between in-person and virtual annual visits, and to determine how these rates varied by test value (high vs low) and test type (point of care vs scheduled). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used electronic health record data on virtual and in-person annual visits conducted between January 1, 2022, and October 25, 2023, among adult patients at 87 primary care practices in a large health system. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to June 2025. Exposure: Virtual or in-person annual visit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of ordering and completion of 15 high- and low-value tests within 11 months after visit. Results: A total of 22 547 matched in-person and virtual visits were examined involving 20 948 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [15.9] years, 14 502 women [69.2%]). All 15 high- and low-value tests were more likely to be ordered and completed at in-person vs virtual visits; generally, high-value tests were more likely to be ordered and completed than low-value tests. At virtual compared with in-person visits, high-value tests were 14.3% (95% CI, -15.5% to -13.2%) less likely to be ordered (relative to the 54.8% in-person rate) and 13.1% (95% CI, -14.1% to -12.0%) less likely to be completed (relative to the 87.7% in-person rate). Low-value tests were 19.3% (95% CI, -21.0% to -17.5%) less likely to be ordered (27.8% in-person rate) and 17.3% (95% CI, -18.5% to -16.1%) less likely to be completed (91.1% in-person rate). When compared with scheduled tests, point-of-care laboratory tests had larger decreases at virtual versus in-person visits in ordering (-18.5% [95% CI, -19.9% to -17.1%] relative to 37.7% in person, vs -11.6% [95% CI, -13.6 to -9.6] for scheduled tests [26.8% in person]) and completion (-16.3% [95% CI, -17.3 to -15.3]; 93.7% in person, vs -6.2% [95% CI, -8.9 to -3.4]; 63.0% in person). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, high- and low-value tests were less likely to be both ordered and completed at virtual annual visits compared with in-person annual visits, particularly low-value tests and laboratory tests. Telemedicine may introduce frictions for clinicians and patients that differentially reduce low-value testing, although high-value tests were also affected; health systems could consider tools, such as gap closure alerts, to selectively promote high-value care.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAdultAgedCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID41739473
PMCPMC12936881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.