SynthesisProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics for the Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that beneficial gut microorganisms, such as probiotics, can treat functional constipation in children. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in treating childhood functional constipation. We conducted a comprehensive search of eight electronic databases, dating from their inception up to July 11, 2024. The eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the use of probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics for treating childhood functional constipation. The RCTs were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and a random effects network meta-analysis was performed under a frequentist framework. Fifteen RCTs involving 1087 participants were identified. Seventeen types of interventions were investigated. With low or very low confidence in the evidence, no significant differences in bowel movements per week were detected between the intervention and placebo groups. Based on very low-certainty evidence, when Mixed was compared with S. boulardii, Mixed (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI [0.48, 1.23], P < 0.001) had positive effects on stool consistency, and synbiotics were supported by low-quality evidence. Compared with S. boulardii, Lactulose (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI [0.25, 0.99], P < 0.001, low certainty) was more efficacious in improving stool consistency. Synbiotics appeared to reduce abdominal pain. In particular, compared with Lcr35, Mixed (SMD = -1.44, 95% CI [-2.67, -0.22], P = 0.021) showed significant benefits in alleviating abdominal pain, although the certainty of evidence was very low. Prebiotics and synbiotics may have potential benefits in stool consistency and reducing abdominal pain. However, the certainty of the evidence is very low to low. Future research should conduct larger-scale, well-designed RCTs to verify these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.