ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
A Muscle-Driven Lumbar Spine Model for Predicting Vibration-Induced Spinal Loads with Adaptive Control.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical study on the 3D morphology and mechanical factors of lumbar facet joints in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLow back pain associated with whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure remains a significant health concern, yet the biomechanical mechanisms linking WBV to spinal loads are incompletely understood. Prior computational studies often relied on simplified assumptions, such as static muscle activation patterns and constrained lumbar joint rotations, limiting the fidelity of dynamic spinal load predictions. To address these gaps, this study aims to establish and validate a muscle-driven lumbar spine model that integrates nonlinear mechanical properties of intervertebral joints and an adaptive feedback control strategy.
methodsA hybrid inverse-forward dynamics framework, integrated with a robust adaptive proportional-integral-derivative (PID)-based control algorithm providing closed-loop feedback tracking, dynamically allocated muscle excitations to stabilize lumbar posture under vertical vibration without artificial rotational constraints. The effects of muscle activations and vibration frequency on spinal biomechanical loads and biodynamic responses were also investigated.
resultsValidations against in vivo intradiscal pressure and erector spinae electromyography showed good agreement (r > 0.9). For biodynamic responses, seat-to-head transmissibility was used to set the pelvis-seat interface properties, and apparent mass was predicted with favorable agreement. A preliminary analysis of frequency effects revealed peak spinal loads near resonance. Active muscle control considerably altered resonance frequencies (4.5 Hz vs. 5 Hz in passive models) and reduced vibration transmissibility while increasing lumbar compressive loads at resonance, highlighting a critical trade-off between vibration mitigation and spinal biomechanical stress.
conclusionBy addressing limitations in resolving dynamic muscle recruitment and joint-level loads, this work provides a validated framework for evaluating vibration-induced spinal biomechanics, offering insights into injury pathways and informing ergonomic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.