ArticleHealth & justice2026
Somebody's going to emergency, somebody's going to jail: pre-booking diversion and officer discretion.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe opioid use epidemic has resulted in dramatic increases in drug overdoses and deaths. Traditional criminal justice approaches to drug use focus on making arrests to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. To reduce the negative impacts generated by criminal justice system involvement for individuals with substance use disorders, police departments have begun turning to pre-booking diversion programs. Unlike traditional diversion programs, where individuals are diverted from the criminal justice system after an arrest, these programs authorize police officers to exercise discretion in referring individuals to treatment resources in lieu of arrest. This study uses a conjoint survey experiment administered to 329 officers in five agencies that were implementing pre-booking diversion programs. Officers are presented with five forced-choice tasks involving individuals eligible for a pre-booking diversion program to assess the factors officers use to decide which individuals they encounter should be referred to treatment.
resultsThe findings from this study indicate that officers consider a variety of demographic and legal characteristics when determining which individuals they are most likely to refer to treatment in a pre-booking diversion program. Officers indicated a preference for referring younger individuals (age=35, AMCE=-0.095, p<0.001; age=45, AMCE=-0.099, p<0.001), females (AMCE =0.033, p=0.042), and Black individuals (AMCE =0.056, p=0.007). Officers were also more likely to refer individuals with less serious criminal histories (drug convictions only, AMCE=-0.099, p<0.001; violent crime convictions, AMCE=-0.317, p<0.001), individuals possessing smaller amounts of drugs (AMCE=-0.070, p<0.001), and individuals who had not committed a crime other than drug possession (shoplifting, AMCE=-0.083, p<0.001; burglary, AMCE=-0.185, p<0.001). Finally, officers were more likely to refer individuals whose current drug of choice involved opioids (fentanyl, AMCE=0.114, p=0.001; oxy, AMCE=0.102, p=0.002; heroin, AMCE=0.099, p=0.003) as compared to marijuana.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates considerable promise for pre-booking diversion programs. The success of pre-booking diversion programs hinges on officers’ willingness to refer individuals with serious substance use issues to treatment. Our study provides experimental evidence that officers are more likely to make treatment referrals for opioids as compared to marijuana, demonstrating promise for pre-booking diversion’s potential to address the opioid epidemic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.