Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739382›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2026

Acute intraperitoneal toxicity prediction using molecular descriptors and feature importance analysis.

Leilei Xin, Yifan Zhang, Xuefeng Liu, Ronghua Liang, Ruru Ma, Yinglong Wang, Peizhe Cui

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leilei XinCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Yifan ZhangCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Xuefeng LiuCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Ronghua LiangCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Ruru MaCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Yinglong WangCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China. wangyinglong@qust.edu.cn.
Peizhe CuiCollege of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China. cpzmagic@qust.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 22178188Taishan Scholar Constructive Engineering Foundation No. tsqn202211163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute intraperitoneal toxicity is a critical endpoint in drug safety evaluation, yet traditional animal-based methods face ethical concerns and interspecies translational limitations. The study developed machine learning (ML) models to predict acute intraperitoneal toxicity (LD50) using 12,480 standard compounds from the ChemIDplus database. Using RDKit (Research Data Kit) descriptors and MACCS keys (Molecular Access System Class keys) to encode molecular structures as input, two integrated models are constructed: RF (Random Forests) and GBDT (Gradient Boosted Decision Trees). Results demonstrated that the MACCS-GBDT (M-G) model achieved superior performance with a test R² of 0.914 and RMSE of 0.218, outperforming other combinations. Feature importance analysis revealed molecular weight (MolWt), topological indices (Chi1n), and specific functional groups (e.g., MACCS bit42) as dominant predictors. These features correlate with bioavailability, metabolic stability, and receptor interactions, explaining species-specific toxicity variations. The study demonstrates the potential of machine learning in accelerating toxicity assessments, offering an ethical alternative to traditional animal testing. It aids in predicting acute toxicity, guiding safer chemical and drug development, and promoting sustainable toxicology research following the 3Rs principles.

Indexed as

Toxicity Tests, AcuteAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsLethal Dose 50Machine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestAcute intraperitoneal toxicityBioavailabilityFeature importancePreclinical toxicity screeningToxicity assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.