ArticleGeroScience2026
Intrinsic capacity across the adult lifespan in China: baseline analysis from the nationwide longitudinal PENG ZU cohort.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrinsic capacity and mortality in community-dwelling octogenarians: a network analysis from the ilSIRENTE study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Intrinsic capacity across the life course: From exposure to functional trajectories and multimorbidity.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
- Latent profile analysis and analytical model construction based on heterogeneity of intrinsic capacity in Chinese older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsic capacity (IC), a composite measure of physical and mental capacities, reflects the functional manifestations of biological aging, yet large-scale population evidence on how IC varies throughout adulthood outside Western settings remains limited. Using data from 17,086 Chinese adults aged 25-89 years in the nationally representative PENG ZU cohort, we characterized age-related variation in IC and its associated factors. IC was assessed across five domains (locomotion, cognition, vitality, psychological, sensory) using self-reported data and physical performance tests. A composite IC score was generated using weighted domain scores and standardized to a 0-100 range. IC levels declined progressively with age, with a sharper decrease and greater variability observed after age 60 in both sexes. The mean IC score was 67.8 (SD = 14) for participants aged < 60 years and 48.6 (SD = 17) for those aged ≥ 60 years. Inflection points were identified at age 60 for men and 62 for women, with significantly faster decline thereafter. The coefficient of variation in IC scores increased with age and differed significantly between adjacent age groups after 60 years. Among those aged ≥ 60, only 6.0% retained high IC, whereas nearly one-third experienced moderate-to-severe loss. Locomotion, cognition, vitality, and sensory domains showed marked age-related decline, with the largest reductions in cognition (60.7%), followed by locomotion (52.9%), vitality (51.0%), and sensory function (39.5%) between ages 50-54 and 85-89, while the psychological domain remained stable. Multivariate ANOVA identified age, education, and health consciousness (assessed via self-reported beliefs about personal responsibility for maintaining health) as the top factors associated with IC. Older age was associated with lower IC, whereas higher education and greater health consciousness were associated with higher IC. Furthermore, health consciousness was inversely associated with ADL/IADL disability across all age groups. These findings identify around 60 years as a critical window for the preservation of intrinsic capacity in Chinese adults and highlight health consciousness as a promising modifiable correlate that merits further investigation in the context of healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.