ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Development and Validation of a Search Filter to Identify Research on Bisexuality.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locating health research on bisexual and pansexual (bisexual+) populations is challenging, as the data are usually collated with data for additional sexual minority and gender identities. To improve the findability of health research on bisexual+ populations, this study sought to develop a sensitivity-maximizing PubMed search filter for bisexuality. Using the relative recall method for the development and validation of search filters, we used PubMed, CitationChaser, and Covidence to search for and screen studies. To be included, studies had to report bisexual/pansexual-specific data and be MEDLINE-indexed with a PubMed Identifier (PMID). Of 291 eligible records, 252 had PMIDs; these records constituted the gold standard set used to develop the search filters. Combinations of search terms were tested against the gold standard set. Sensitivity and number needed to read (NNR) were calculated for each combination. Two search filters are presented. The sensitivity-maximizing search retrieved 100% of the gold standard set, with an NNR of 129.85. The optimized search retrieved all but one of the gold standard articles (99.60%), with an NNR of 74.88. Two PubMed search filters are presented for bisexual+ populations. These filters were validated using the relative recall method against a gold standard set derived from citing and cited references of systematic reviews on bisexual+ health. Use of the sensitivity-maximizing search filter is recommended for exhaustive searches, while the optimized filter is considered more appropriate for nonexhaustive searches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.