ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
Intelligent Recognition Network for Difficult Airway Based on Multi-View Input and Attention Aggregation.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In anesthesiology, difficult airway (DA) poses significant safety risks. Current deep learning-based DA recognition methods exhibit limited performance due to single-view reliance or simplistic multi-view fusion. To address these constraints, we propose an intelligent DA recognition network using multi-view input with attention aggregation, aimed at achieving automatic DA assessment through multi-view patient image integration. Compared with existing DA recognition techniques, our method offers several advantages. First, our network utilizes five patient images captured from different perspectives, systematically capturing essential assessment factors: maximum mouth opening, Mallampati score, neck circumference, neck length, and neck movement, thereby providing more comprehensive information. Second, we design an attention-based feature aggregation operator to fully leverage inter-view relationships, enhancing feature extraction capabilities and improving recognition performance. Additionally, we construct a multi-view patient image dataset comprising images from 481 patients, with five images per patient from distinct perspectives. Through five-fold cross-validation experiments, our method achieves accuracy of 93.54%, sensitivity of 83.33%, specificity of 96.94%, and F1-score of 86.53%, significantly outperforming other compared methods. This study was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on August 10, 2021, with registration number ChiCTR2100049879.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.