ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026
Isolation and evaluation of antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria by Lactobacillus and Enterococcus spp. from the saliva of Speothos venaticus and Chrysocyon brachyurus.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saliva plays a crucial role in oral defense across mammals by combining host-derived antimicrobial factors with antagonistic indigenous microbiota. Understanding the composition of the oral lactic microbiota in wild canids may provide valuable insights into microbial ecology and animal health. In this study, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus spp. isolated from the saliva of South American bush dogs (Speothos venaticus) and maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) were enumerated, identified, and evaluated for their antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria. For bacterial isolation, MRS agar and BHI agar supplemented with sodium azide (BHI-SA) were used for Lactobacillus and Enterococcus, respectively. Identification of the bacterial isolates was performed using PCR-ARDRA and multiplex PCR. Antagonistic activity was assessed using a double-layer agar diffusion assay, which detects diffusible inhibitory effects without identifying the compounds involved. A total of 23 bacterial isolates were obtained from BHI-SA and 24 from MRS for bush dogs, while 15 were recovered from BHI-SA and 23 from MRS for maned wolves. Salivary bacterial counts ranged from 4.0 to 5.0 log10 CFU/mL. In bush dogs, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium were identified, while E. faecalis and Enterococcus hirae were found in maned wolves. Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus johnsonii were isolated from bush dogs, while Ligilactobacillus salivarius and Latilactobacillus curvatus were identified in maned wolves. Antagonistic activity against indicator pathogens was more frequent among Lactobacillus isolates. These results suggest that the antibacterial properties observed in the saliva of these wild canids may be partly attributed to indigenous Lactobacillus and Enterococcus species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.