ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Data mining in pediatric radiology in the era of artificial intelligence.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prompting the future: artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Research on intellectual property rights and legal liability definition of artificial intelligence-assisted pediatric disease diagnosis system.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data mining is the systematic process of extracting useful knowledge from large multimodal datasets and is increasingly enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) methods. Pediatric radiology is a natural field for data mining because multimodal data sources, including images, reports, metadata, and electronic health records, together capture rich information on anatomy, disease, treatment, and outcomes. In the current era, the boundaries between data mining and AI are increasingly blurred. AI assists in key steps of the mining workflow through automated labeling, information extraction, and representation learning, while data mining provides the high-quality curated datasets that underpin model performance, generalizability, and safety. This review, therefore, examines both domains together, emphasizing their interdependence in the pediatric context. We describe core concepts and workflows of data mining in pediatric radiology, including data collection, linkage, annotation, analysis, validation, and governance, and outline how modern AI tools such as deep learning, large language models, multimodal fusion, and federated learning support advanced pattern discovery across limited and heterogeneous pediatric datasets. We summarize current and emerging clinical applications across diagnosis, prognosis, radiation dose monitoring, operational analytics, reporting safety nets, and continual learning. We then discuss current challenges related to data quality and standardization, ethics, regulation, workflow integration, resource disparities, sustainability, and explainability. Finally, we highlight future perspectives, including synthetic data generation, foundation models, structured reporting, and pediatric-focused ethical frameworks that aim to enable safe, transparent, and equitable integration of AI-driven data mining to improve outcomes in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.