ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Comparison of human motor unit firing rates in the vastus intermedius and vastus lateralis during isometric knee extension.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intermittent low-intensity contractions cause a dissociation between maximal motor unit firing rates and changes in torque and contractile speed.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNeuromuscular properties have been well-studied in three of the four muscles of the quadriceps femoris. However, lack of accessibility of the vastus intermedius (VI) due to its deep location has precluded comprehensive insight on motor unit (MU) properties. Thus, the purpose here was to compare the MU firing rates of the VI and vastus lateralis (VL).
methodsIn ten young participants (3 females), ultrasound-guided intramuscular tungsten microelectrodes were used to record MU firing rates from the VI and VL during non-fatiguing contractions at four intensities, including during maximal efforts.
resultsMaximal knee extension torque was 518 ± 113 N with voluntary activation of over 90%. A total of 2741 MU trains were sampled with equal numbers from both muscles. There was a linear relationship between contractile intensity and mean MU firing rate in both the VI and VL (r = 0.79 and 0.81; P < 0.001), and rates ranged from ~ 8 Hz at 10% to ~ 27 Hz at maximum with no difference between the two muscles (P = 0.45) at any force level (P = 0.08).
conclusionDespite, differences in anatomical and muscular architecture allowing for varying contributions to knee extension, MU firing rates were similar between the VI and VL. This indicates at the motor unit level that fundamental neural activation strategies between the two larger torque generating muscles of the quadriceps may be similar based on mean MU firing rates. Any variation in the relative contributions to knee extensor torque from these synergists may be governed more by biomechanical factors rather than apparent motor unit firing rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.