ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Carotid Doppler imaging in glaucoma and glaucoma suspects.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the association of carotid occlusive disease (COD) in glaucoma and glaucoma suspects.
methodsWe retrospectively (January 2012 to June 2022) reviewed medical records and carotid Doppler reports of 485 eyes from 279 patients of glaucoma suspects, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), or normal tension glaucoma (NTG) with suspected vascular pathology or unexplained Humphrey visual field (HVF) progression. Carotid artery involvement was determined by the presence of significant stenosis as reported in carotid Doppler imaging.
resultsMean age of patients was 63 years (SD: 11.2), of whom 78.1% were males. Carotid artery involvement was seen in 7.4% POAG, 11.4% NTG, and 12% of those with unexplained HVF progression. In contrast, only 3% of individuals in the glaucoma suspect group had stenosis exceeding 10% (P > 0.05). There was a weak correlation between worsening visual field index (VFI) values and increasing stenosis (r = -0.22).
conclusionCOD was rare among glaucoma suspects but commoner among NTG and POAG eyes with unexplained progression and may have clinical relevance only in these subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.