Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739114›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2026

Management of primary congenital glaucoma in the Indian population.

Manasi Tripathi, Viney Gupta, Shikha Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manasi TripathiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Viney Gupta
Shikha Gupta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) is a leading cause of childhood visual impairment and blindness worldwide, with a disproportionately high burden in low- and middle-income countries such as India. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention are critical to prevent irreversible vision loss in affected children. This study aimed to review and synthesize current evidence on surgical management strategies for PCG in the Indian context. The objective was to identify the most effective, evidence-based surgical approaches to optimize outcomes in Indian children with PCG. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, followed by a systematic literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases for the surgical management strategies in Indian context for PCG eyes. Keywords included "Primary congenital glaucoma," "trabeculotomy," "trabeculectomy," "goniotomy," "glaucoma drainage devices," "complications," and "India." Only English language articles with full text availability were included. Data were extracted and analyzed to compare surgical outcomes and determine best practices. Trabeculotomy and goniotomy remain first-line surgical interventions, with combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy showing superior long-term success rates in the Indian population. Glaucoma drainage devices are primarily reserved for refractory or advanced cases. Lifelong monitoring is essential due to the potential decline in surgical success over time. In the Indian setting, combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy represents an effective, evidence-based surgical strategy for PCG management. Early surgical intervention and individualized treatment remain critical to preserving vision and reducing blindness in affected children.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementGlaucomaIntraocular PressureTrabeculectomyHumansIndiaGATTgoniotomyprimary congenital glaucomatrabeculectomytrabeculotomy

Identifiers

PMID41739114
PMCPMC13002012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.