Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739091›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers

The impact of HER2 low positivity in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Mustafa Ersoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mustafa ErsoyKütahya Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kutahya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AimsThis study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy differs between HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.Materials and MethodsA total of 61 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2015 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. HER2 status was determined from pre-treatment core biopsy specimens and classified as HER2-low (IHC 1 + or 2 + and FISH-negative) or HER2-zero (IHC 0). The pathological complete response (pCR) rates were compared between the two groups.ResultsAmong 61 patients, 28 had HER2-low and 33 had HER2-zero tumors. The pCR rate was 7.1% in the HER2-low group and 27.3% in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.042). A post-hoc power analysis based on these results showed a moderate power (0.59) to detect the observed difference.ConclusionsHER2-low expression may negatively influence chemosensitivity in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential role of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and other antibody-drug conjugates in this newly defined subgroup.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPathologic Complete ResponseReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerclinical trialsdrug effects

Identifiers

PMID41739091
PMCPMC13055881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.