Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41739039›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025

Who receives abortions at 6- or 16-weeks' gestation? A case study from Ohio.

Pragi Patel, Payal Chakraborty, Bucky Foster, Jacob Kepes, Danielle Bessett, Alison H Norris, Mikaela H Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pragi PatelMedical Student, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Payal ChakrabortyPostdoctoral Researcher, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bucky FosterPhD Student, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jacob KepesPhD Student, Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Danielle BessettProfessor, Department of Sociology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Alison H NorrisProfessor, Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mikaela H SmithResearch Scientist, Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Correspondence: smith.14017@osu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5658-4808

Funding

Differences in unintended pregnancies by state contextsR00HD114852 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHAKRABORTY, PAYAL · 2025 to 2025
$642k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD114852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, states enacted gestation-based bans following the US Supreme Court case

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, LegalGestational AgeAdultBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansOhioPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstWhiteYoung Adultabortionchart reviewgestation banhealth policyOhio

Identifiers

PMID41739039
PMCPMC13011096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.