Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41738946›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

A Structure-Function Dataset With Known Rates of Glaucomatous Progression.

Andrew Turpin, Vasanth Muthusamy, Munis Raviselvan, Allison M McKendrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew TurpinLions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia.
Vasanth MuthusamyLions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia.
Munis RaviselvanLions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia.
Allison M McKendrickLions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This article describes the Lions Eye Institute Structure-Function Dataset (LEI-SFD), an open, synthetic dataset of both structural and functional measurements from eyes with glaucoma that are progressing at known rates. Methods: The LEI-SFD contains static automated perimetry (SAP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness data (circumpapillary RNFL [cpRNFL]) that is progressing at known rates for 10 visits over 5 years. Measurements at the 10th visit and progression rates are taken from curated clinical data collected at Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia. Measurement noise is added based on existing literature. Results: The dataset contains 162 eyes with a mean (SD) baseline mean deviation of -2.6 (4.0) dB (minimum, -17.6; maximum, 1.6) and a mean (SD) cpRNFL thickness of 77.7 (13.5) microns (minimum, 43; maximum, 109). The average number of progressing SAP locations per eye is 20.8, with a mean pointwise rate of -0.6 dB/y. Using Permutation of Pointwise Linear Regression (PoPLR) to assess progression on the resulting datasets gives similar classification results to those published on clinical data. Conclusions: This open dataset contains longitudinal, linked structural and functional data with known progression rates. By using visit data and progression rates from real eyes to seed its synthetic generation, relationships between structure and function in current clinical data should be preserved, but with ground-truth progression rates being known. Translational Relevance: This open dataset will allow the assessment of the performance of methods for determining glaucomatous progression that use both structure and function on a common benchmark.

Indexed as

GlaucomaRetinal Ganglion CellsAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID41738946
PMCPMC12949477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.