Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41738759›Full record

ReviewmBio2026

mGem: Applying microbiome therapeutic learnings to next-generation agricultural bioproducts.

Eric C Holmes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric C HolmesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5637-0404

Funding

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 7011213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological discoveries in plant and human systems have long advanced our understanding of how signaling, metabolism, and immunity shape cross-kingdom interactions. Building on this rich history of interdisciplinary insight, there is now a tremendous opportunity to strengthen connections between human and agricultural microbiome research. This perspective highlights key biological synergies across these systems that are essential for advancing human, agricultural, and ecosystem health. Focus is given to colonization, immune, and biosafety engineering strategies developed for microbiome therapeutics that can guide the design and development of next-generation agricultural bioproducts. Ultimately, greater knowledge exchange and collaboration across disciplines will be critical to translate microbiome discoveries into bioproducts with positive societal impact.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiological ProductsMicrobiotaHumansPlantsBiological Productsagricultural bioproductsbiocontrolcolonizationcross-kingdom synergyimmune engineeringmicrobiome therapeuticsplant microbiome

Identifiers

PMID41738759
PMCPMC13059763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.