ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Efficacy of Hand Gestures and the Hand as Foot Teaching Method Compared to Traditional Methods in Medical and Dental Education: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe "Hand-as-Foot" teaching method is an innovative, hands-on approach that uses gesture-based movements to represent anatomical structures and functions. It has been used successfully in medical education to help simplify and communicate complex ideas. However, its use in dental education remains relatively unexplored. This scoping review set out to examine how hand gestures, including the Hand-as-Foot technique, are being used in medical and dental classrooms, and whether they offer benefits over traditional teaching methods. We also aim to identify gaps in the current research to guide future studies.
methodsWe followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to conduct a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and SCOPUS, with additional manual searches in Google Scholar and key academic journals. Studies were included if they evaluated the effectiveness of hand gestures in teaching clinical or non-clinical subjects in medical or dental education. Eligible study designs included clinical trials, interventional studies, observational studies, and cohort or case-control studies. Only English-language publications were included, while reviews, editorials, and opinion pieces were excluded. A descriptive analysis was used to summarize the findings.
resultsOut of 57 records identified, 29 were duplicates, 15 were removed, and 14 were resolved manually leaving 42 articles for screening. After title and abstract review, 10 articles were excluded. Full-text screening of 32 articles led to the removal of 26 that were out of scope. In total, six studies were included in the review. Of these, four were comparative studies that directly evaluated gesture-based teaching against traditional lecture-style instruction in medical and dental education.
conclusionAlthough early findings are promising, research on gesture-based teaching especially the "Hand-as-Foot method" is still limited, particularly in dental education. Most available studies suggest improved engagement and understanding, but high-quality, comparative research is needed to support broader adoption of these techniques in health education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.