ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2026
Comprehensive Clinical, Diagnostic, and In Silico Assessment of a Novel 1p36.33p36.32 Copy Number Variant.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical manifestations of 1p36.33 duplications vary depending on duplication size. This region is prone to copy number variants associated with diverse phenotypes. We report a novel 1p36.33p36.32 duplication in a patient with developmental delay and facial dysmorphism. The causative duplication was detected by whole-genome Oligo-array CGH and confirmed by real-time PCR. Integrative bioinformatic analyses-including network analysis, phenotype-driven gene prioritisation, and dosage sensitivity assessment-were performed to explore the molecular basis of the phenotype; we used integrative bioinformatic analyses, including network analysis, phenotype-driven gene prioritisation, and dosage sensitivity assessment. Assessment of a child with tonic seizures, developmental delay, and dysmorphic facial traits revealed a 2.3 MB gain in the 1p36.33p36.32 region (nucleotide 898,721 to 3,153,945) through array CGH. Bioinformatic analyses identified several candidate genes, including GABRD, DVL1, and GNB1, which are implicated in neurodevelopmental and congenital disorders. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant involvement of the '1P36 Copy Number Variation Syndrome' pathway. This case expands the phenotypic spectrum of 1p36 duplications and highlights the importance of integrating clinical, genomic, and bioinformatic data for accurate interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.