Observational studyEuropean journal of neurology2026
Safety of Physical Activity After Cervical Artery Dissection.
Observational study in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a major cause for stroke in young adults. A timely association with minor-to-moderate unimposing cervical trauma, which is often sports-related, is common in CeAD. Our goal was to assess whether physical activity puts patients at risk post-CeAD.
methodsPooled data from two prospective observational CeAD cohorts with in-person follow-up of at least 1-year post-CeAD were assessed. Changes in physical activity were recorded using patient-reported assessment of change in activity compared to pre-CeAD. Baecke score-derived sports index was applied to address the association between physical activity intensity and our outcomes. Outcomes were (1) recurrent dissection and (2) cerebral ischemia upon follow-up.
resultsA total of 648 CeAD patients were recorded. Physical activity-specific follow-up data were available in 333 (59.7%). The median follow-up duration was 6.5 (IQR 3.1, 10.9) years with 17/333 (5.1%) suffering CeAD recurrence and 22/33#3 (6.6%) experiencing cerebral ischemia. A total of 197 of 333 (59.2%) patients reported a change in physical activity post-CeAD (127 [64.5%] decrease, 70 [35.5%] increase). Neither overall change, increase, or decrease of physical activity was associated with recurrent CeAD or cerebral ischemia (p > 0.2 throughout). However, regular performance of higher-intensity sports, assessed via Baecke score-derived sports index, associated in trend to dissection recurrence (OR 3.43 [0.86, 13.64]; p = 0.080).
conclusionsCeAD patients should be reassured that regaining physical activity after CeAD is safe. However, moderation on exertion should be discussed on an individual patient basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.