ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the global research landscape and knowledge structure of robotic-assisted dental, oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Comment on "Evaluation of inflammatory markers in survival analysis of patients undergoing radical cystectomy using machine learning".World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Endoscope-assisted transoral removal of benign midline cervical neoplasms: A preliminary study.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Ellagic acid can improve stroke by regulating gut microbiota.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this umbrella review is to investigate the advantages of primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) over other treatments such as open surgery (OS), transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and primary radiotherapy in the diagnosis management of head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search for meta-analyses of comparisons between TORS of HNC and other treatments such as OS, TLM and primary radiotherapy was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases. The primary outcomes assessed include oncological outcomes, surgical outcomes, function outcomes and complicates. The AMSTAR-2 tool was used to assess the quality, which consists of 16 entries, with final quality outcomes categorized as "critically low quality," "low quality," "moderate quality," and "high quality."
resultsOf the 1424 articles retrieved, 14 studies were eventually included for the comprehensive umbrella meta-analysis. TORS was superior to OS in terms of survival rate, length of hospital stay, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, surgical efficacy, and recognition of HNC with unknown primary lesion, but no significant difference was seen between them and TLM or radiation therapy.
conclusionThere are few studies on head and neck tumors other than oropharyngeal cancer, and there is a lack of studies on specific tumor stages or HPV status of the population, which does not allow for the provision of personalized treatment recommendations based on the patient's own situation, and there is a need to carry out more randomized controlled trials on the specific type and status of the patient in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.