Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41738503›Full record

ArticlePsychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society2026

Characteristics of Older Adults With Domestic Squalor in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Daiki Taomoto, Hideki Kanemoto, Takashi Suehiro, Yuto Satake, Naomi Nakamuta, Maki Hotta, Maki Suzuki, Kenji Yoshiyama, Toyoko Miyoshi, Kazue Kashiwagi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daiki TaomotoDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki KanemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-1469
Takashi SuehiroDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-4280
Yuto SatakeDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9350-3162
Naomi NakamutaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Maki HottaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Maki SuzukiDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, United Graduate School of Child Development, the University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji YoshiyamaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Toyoko MiyoshiAsakayama General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazue KashiwagiAsakayama General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazue ShigenobuDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, United Graduate School of Child Development, the University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Mamoru HashimotoDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu IkedaDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 21K21189JSPS KAKENHI T25K025920Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) Program JPMH20CA2088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic squalor (DS) is related to physical problems, living alone, family and neighbourhood problems and mental illnesses, especially dementia. However, methods to detect and treat older adults with DS remain unclear. We aimed to clarify the methods of appropriate intervention for older adults with DS.

methodsThe Initial-phase Intensive Support Team for Dementia (IPIST) is a multidisciplinary outreach team in Japan that provides intensive support to people living at home with suspected dementia. We distributed a questionnaire to 50 IPISTs, specifically requesting the submission of 'two complex cases that were difficult to manage' regarding medical or long-term care. The questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, diagnosis, referral sources, and reasons for complexity. We compared cases with and without DS (DS+ vs. DS-), and DS cases living alone and those living with family (DS+ living alone vs. DS+ living with family).

resultsWe received responses from 33 IPISTs and collected data from 70 complex cases. DS was selected as the reason for complexity in 24 cases, 14 of which were people living alone. Significantly fewer DS+ cases were referred by family (8.3% vs. 54.3%), while significantly more were referred by others (87.5% vs. 41.3%). The most common referral sources were neighbours and social workers. DS+ cases had significantly higher rates of self-neglect (87.5% vs. 13.0%). Those living alone were significantly younger (median (interquartile range): 78.5 (76.8-82.8) years) than those living with family (85.0 (78.8-89.8) years). Family members living with DS+ cases also had issues, including mental illness or maltreatment.

conclusionsIn this study sample, many older adults with DS exhibited self-neglect and had limited family support. Our findings suggest that a comprehensive approach to both older adults with DS and their families is crucial for appropriate intervention. Therefore, IPISTs that have a multidisciplinary team with an outreach function may be effective.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesdementiaDiogenes syndromehoarding symptominitial‐phase intensive support team for dementiaself‐neglect

Identifiers

PMID41738503
PMCPMC12933695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.