ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2026
Achieved LDL-C levels <55 mg/dL and cardiac events in patients and lesions harbouring lipid-rich plaque phenotypes.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04864171 (REvelation of PAthophySiological PhenotypeS of VUlneRable Lipid-Rich PlaquE on Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
REvelation of PAthophySiological PhenotypeS of VUlneRable Lipid-Rich PlaquE on Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy: REASSURE-NIRS
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 55 mg/dL in very-high-risk patients. Given that plaque phenotype underscores its modulatory response to lipid-lowering therapies, patients and lesions harbouring lipid-laden plaques may benefit from LDL-C < 55 mg/dL to reduce their cardiovascular risks. METHODS AND
resultsThe REASSURE-NIRS (REvelation of PAthophySiological PhenotypeS of VUlneRable Lipid-Rich PlaquE on Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy) multi-centre registry enrolled 853 coronary artery disease patients (non-culprit lesions = 1662) receiving NIRS/IVUS-guided PCI (NCT04864171). LDL-C level at 3 months after PCI was used as on-treatment LDL-C. Study subjects were stratified according to maxLCBI4mm at non-culprit lesions < vs. ≥324.7. In each group, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (=cardiac-cause death + non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) + ischaemia-driven non-culprit lesion revascularization) was compared in those with on-treatment LDL-C < vs. ≥55 mg/dL. 31.6% of study subjects achieved on-treatment LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. During the observational period (median = 1109 days), MACE rate did not differ in patients with maxLCBI4mm < 324.7 exhibiting on-treatment LDL-C levels < and ≥55 mg/dL [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-2.54, P = 0.227]. By contrast, in patients with non-culprit lesion maxLCBI4mm ≥ 324.7, a significantly reduced MACE rate was observed in those with on-treatment LDL-C < 55 mg/dL (adjusted HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.57, P = 0.010). These relationships were similarly observed in a lesion-based analysis (non-culprit lesion maxLCBI4mm < 324.7: adjusted HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.42-4.00, P = 0.640, non-culprit lesion maxLCBI4mm ≥ 324.7: adjusted HR = 0.27, 95% CI:0.08-0.97, P = 0.045). Notably, in patients with multiple non-culprit lesions with maxLCBI4mm ≥ 324.7, on-treatment LDL-C < 55 mg/dL was associated with a lower frequency of MACE (adjusted HR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.09-0.53, P < 0.001), whereas this relationship was not observed in those with single non-culprit lesion with maxLCBI4mm ≥ 324.7 (adjusted HR = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.00-5.55, P = 0.196).
conclusionNIRS-derived lipid-rich plaque may be a potential imaging measure reflecting patients and lesions that may benefit from achieving LDL-C levels < 55 mg/dL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.