ArticleThe ultrasound journal2026
Prediction of in-vitro fertilization outcome by ultrasound strain analysis and machine learning: A multi-center study.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn-vitro-fertilization (IVF) failure rates remain above 65% with unknown causes. Uterine receptivity, largely determined by uterine peristalsis, is believed to play a key role in the IVF success. Accurate assessment of uterine peristalsis holds the potential for improving the success rate of embryo implantation.
methodsThis prospective study includes 62 IVF patients from multiple fertility centers under three different clinical settings. Four-minute B-mode transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) scans were performed one hour before embryo transfer (ET). 25 features related to frequency, amplitude, power, velocity, and coordination were extracted using strain analysis from TVUS speckle tracking results. Three probabilistic classifiers, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), were employed to discriminate uterine activity as either favorable or adverse to clinical pregnancy rate. Prior to machine learning, feature selection was performed by categorized feature ranking and sequential forward selection. The proposed method was evaluated by a nested 8-fold cross validation. Results: Our results suggest that features related to coordination and frequency of the uterine peristalsis are strongly associated with clinical pregnancy. SVM demonstrates the best classification performance between successful and unsuccessful pregnancies, with an average area under the ROC curve of 0.81.
conclusionsWe developed a machine learning framework to improve the prediction of IVF outcome based on multi-center TVUS recordings. Our SVM model identified significant uterine motion features and demonstrated reliable and generalizable classification performance. This work can provide useful means to support clinicians for clinical decision-making prior to ET and possibly enhance IVF success rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.