ReviewClinical and experimental rheumatology2026
Shaping the landscape of interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: state of the art, evidence gaps and a need for clinical trials.
Review in Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects a significant proportion of adults and children with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM-ILD and JIIM-ILD). Despite its major impact on mortality and therapeutic decision‑making, robust studies and clinical trials to inform evidence‑based practice are strikingly scarce. Heterogeneous clinical manifestations, variable testing practices, and lack of widely accepted nomenclature and standardised endpoint definitions magnify the challenges to design clinical trials for this novel disease subtype.Thus, the Myositis Clinical Trials Consortium (MCTC) developed the IIMILD working group (WG) to bridge the gaps and address the challenges unique to these patients. The IIM-ILD WG will accomplish these objectives by leveraging MCTC's global network of over 960 members, including physicians from multiple specialties, researchers, industry collaborators, and patient-support organisations. Collectively, the paper emphasises the need for structured phenotyping, unified terminology, and validated outcome measures as indispensable prerequisites for designing rigorous, multicentre trials in patients with IIM-ILD and JIIM-ILD. By leveraging the MCTC platform, the IIM-ILD Working Group will accelerate therapeutic development and ultimately improve outcomes for adults and children afflicted with IIM-associated ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.