ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
A Deep Metric Learning and Multimodal Gated Fusion Framework for AI-Driven Risk Assessment of Lingual Plate Perforation and Mandibular Canal Injury in Posterior Mandible Implants.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Deep Metric Learning and Multimodal Gated Fusion Framework for AI-Driven Risk Assessment of Lingual Plate Perforation and Mandibular Canal Injury in Posterior Mandible Implants.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To provide an automated risk assessment for lingual plate perforation (LPP) and mandibular canal injury (MCI) in dental implants. Also, to reduce interoperator variability in risk classification and eliminate manual measurements during implant planning. Methods: A dataset of 896 CBCT-implant records was used for training our model (DentaRisk-Net). CBCT images were processed using ResNet-18 encoders for each implant site view. Patient-specific metadata was processed through a fully connected network. These modalities were fused using a gated fusion mechanism (GFM). Deep metric learning (DML) was employed to enhance distinguish of risk classes. The model was trained on two risk tasks: bone plate (BP) and mandibular canal (MC) tasks. Classification and regression metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, Results: The model achieved an accuracy exceeding 0.87 in detecting risk in implant sites, with precision and recall above 0.84. The GFM increased Conclusion: By integrating imaging and metadata through DML and GFM, the model attempted to reduce interoperator variability in decision-making and enhance risk-classified assessment in the treatment planning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.